A especially problematic approach for distinguishing people in same-sex relationships may be the utilization of proxy reports.

A especially problematic approach for distinguishing people in same-sex relationships may be the utilization of proxy reports.

In a few dyadic studies information have now been gathered from both lovers individually, concentrating on points of overlap and distinctions between partners’ records, learning such dilemmas whilst the symbolic concept of appropriate unions for same-sex couples (Reczek, Elliott, & Umberson, 2009; Rothblum et al., 2011b), parenting experiences (Goldberg, Kinkler, Richardson, & Downing, 2011), closeness characteristics (Umberson, Thomeer, & Lodge, in press), interracial relationship characteristics (Steinbugler, 2010), partners’ interactions around wellness behavior (Reczek & Umberson, 2012), and relationship satisfaction and closeness (Totenhagen et al., 2012). On the other hand, other studies have gathered information from lovers simultaneously, through joint interviews, experiments, or observations that are ethnographic emphasizing interactions between partners or lovers’ collective reactions. As an example, scientists used observational ways to offer unique insights into same-sex couples’ conflict styles (Gottman, 1993), unit of home work (Moore, 2008), and coparenting interactions (Farr & Patterson, 2013).

Challenges and methods for studying relationships that are same-Sex

This is no reason to avoid the study of same-sex relationships although current data are characterized by several limitations.


read more